A few days ago with Mr. Zhao Nanyuan professor at Tsinghua University to meet Professor Zhao was informed recently wrote a long article, the content on animal protection issues. Full-fat Sima Nan's blog, then find time to read a bit. Mr. Zhao wrote this the cause of the article, is drafting a number of experts are China's , have different views, deliberately wrote this long article. This is a very interesting topic.
First, we have a basic understanding, the Chinese have the Protection Act, a lot of debate. Therefore, the process of drafting the The long, a lot of content involved. I write this article, just read Mr. Zhao feelings, can be considered for Professor Zhao Nanyuan an echo.
animal protectionism, an ethical issue involved, namely, the relationship between people and animals. people live world, living together with other people, kindness and love is the common human advocated. So, people give a similar kind and loving, whether animals should be given? or to fine-point, people should treat animals the same treatment of similar? conservationists believe that people are animals, so people should treat animals equally, that is, for the moral standards should also apply to animals. In my view, the basic view of this animal protectionist is wrong. If the extreme development of this view, is tantamount to terrorism.
China from the time of Confucius 2,500 years ago to establish a barn fire, just ask whether the injured, without asking the horse. with modern animal protection point of view, Confucius probably belong to the ideas. Indeed, humanism is the man on the most important position, the core of all social activities, that is, the principle of people-first principle , the core principles. For example, murder should be for life, this is the humanistic spirit. Because people are the most important. This idea negates the consciousness. Even so, animals and humanism would still believe that people kill animals is not a crime. and this is against animal protectionist.
animals have different forms of protectionism and extreme conservationists, and extreme eco-protectionists is the same. In the United States, some extreme conservationists, consciously carry gun in the patrol protected areas and found that unauthorized access to, they opened fire. This protectionism is even more important animals than our people. Recently I often spam, these junk e-mail from the perspective of animal protection, calling it completely vegetarian. which I have little doubt that if the conclusion that: , not people-oriented, is a kind of naive innocence.
animal protectionist against the humanistic spirit of the naive and innocent, very easy to terrorism. how to understand? animal protectionist surface, is to improve animal treatment the animals to the same level with others, seems to be a manifestation of love. However, from another perspective, protectionism is also equal to the lower animals, human values, the people put the same status as animals. People When the factory slaughtering animals for slaughter per day will not have too much doubt, if the animal becomes completely equal footing with others,UGG boots, slaughtering animals and slaughtering people, it has become the same? Therefore, Mr. Zhao Nanyuan noted in the article Hitler was a staunch advocates of animal to keep, and he does the same as the slaughter of animals killing humans. Therefore, if we are to adhere to the protectionist views, mostly from the extreme western thinking and naive idealism, which reveals a lot of non-civilized and barbaric symbol. Mr. Zhao Nanyuan expressed disdain. For example, assume that the General Assembly, the Indians became the world how old? we know as the cow is held sacred Hindu, so the Indians do not eat beef. If the Indians lead the world So, the Western habit of eating raw beef blood, whether as involves a larger issue, Western Center on the West often impose their own standards to the world, and as a .
the as long as the non -western, that is barbaric. Today, this mindset is also extended to the field of animal protectionist. In order to prove that the East including China, is a savage, animal protectionist attitudes from the treatment of animals, also found a basis for to prove the thesis of the very correct. This is a first, find evidence to push down theory, which will have to savage, brutal ever this fallacy. 's attitude towards animals has become a symbol of civilization and progress, the poor Chinese people also received a lot of this Western concept, including Mr. Zhao Nanyuan who criticized the article in the experts. They only Western standards to regulate their own, but I do not know the Western connotation of animal protectionist thinking how ridiculous.
example, there are many ethnic Chinese people eat animal intestines, the basic Westerners do not eat, France people love to eat foie gras, also vigorously attacked by an animal protectionist. As long as reflect on what you see, the same to kill a pig , if offal, pig, pig, pig tails, and so will eat anything,UGG bailey button, obviously, and compared to only eat pork, the former can feed more people. In other words, feed a person for the number of animals consumed less. And Westerners will only eat meat, do not eat other Yigai practice, feed consumed by a person animal life more. From this sense, the Eastern culture and Western culture compared to those who cherish animals? Another example, according to Eastern tradition, the natural restocking livestock and poultry are generally the only Westerners to economies of scale, and produced large-scale centralized way in captivity. A captive animals, almost no space; animal disease, deformity common; large-scale use of antibiotics; even convenient for later processing, biotechnology West devotes a Chicken. point of view, in many ways seem innocent and naive. This is the innocence of childhood of mankind, and adolescents often linked to violent tendencies. So, animal protectionist thinking whether there is a reasonable place? In fact , whenever some reasonable, the animal protectionist already highly publicized, and I do not have to repeat herself. The reason why the rationality of animal protectionism is not easy to be remembered, in fact, is not prominent because of its rationality. The most striking point is that biological diversity. But the greatest threat to biodiversity is who? In addition to the modern industrial West, who else? Therefore,UGG shoes, most of the animal protectionist against the object, it is the Western civilization itself. some are Western brainwash the Chinese people, animals should not be used to continue to accuse China of protectionist thinking people. with the animal protection to re-prove that in the same position with the people.
the protection of wild animals, is another topic, the previous piecemeal said, say no more here.
Professor Zhao Nanyuan Original: the accumulation of lies and fallacies Professor Zhao Nanyuan a
original: the accumulation of lies and fallacies of the two
articles:
animal protectionist addition of non-
Earth billions of mouth will not be a dinosaur human
second
fart: one of the culprits of global warming
native and exotic sheep,Bailey UGG boots, said: earth is my hell
Yangcheng Lake hairy crabs Compatriots
report a tree to change the world
Why do reptiles to maintain the diversity of inspiration
one trillion years after the black sheep of television signals and enlightenment
also getting himself into too much love between man and nature
three ways
The bottom line
Biotechnology destroy people and animals breathe a little bit of difference in charges Xuhui Cheng
really
refused to fin!
01: get ready for the mouth of a nagging words
02: the mouth is very important
03: someone else's mouth a little bad
04: the mouth position is not high
05: from the mouth Eternal far
06: mouth distance
07: no distance would be no aesthetic
08: No distance is no mystery
09: mouth now stand Rights < br> 10: Taste is a personalized
11: the mouth is exposed to the privacy
12: Why does McDonald's have been left out
13: mouth is impulsive
14: mouth of life the last line of defense
15: If the mouth of dereliction of duty
16: I worry about my happy mouth
17: mouth refused Science
18: meat vegetarian and civilization
19: delicious food that flavors
20: war, hunger and fat weight m
21: different cultures food
22: What is the
No comments:
Post a Comment